Morphic Resonance

Kharma Runs Over Dogma! Science Weeps.

The barking dogmatists who cannot bring themselves to explore any new idea that gives them disquiet need to now muzzle-up, come to heel, and sit quietly so they can happily expand their options in this universe.

Because, if a scientific experiment leads you into something akin to metaphysics, well that probably means your current view of science is bullshit.

Article on analysing Morphogenetics

Rupert Sheldrake – The Science Delusion BANNED TED TALK

(total 18 mins)…

… I was researching the issue of so-called Morphic / Morphogenic / Morphogenetic Resonance (Fields) and came across an expert by the name of Rupert Sheldrake.

I actually respect Sheldrake for having the courage to put forward his analyses of Biology and questioning dogmatism in the mainstream scientific community.

Also, Sheldrake’s fearless expression of the various assumptions/dogmas of science so as to expose the fact that financial-grant tenure-seeking mainstream scientists will foolishly support a rotting core of scientific dogma despite that these dogmas fly in the face of common sense.

As is often the case, the mainstream too often seeks “proof” when semantically there can be no such thing. Only Mathematics can boast the proper use of the phrase “proof”. Moreover, they mistake the interpretation of the Scientific Method as being a “search for proof”, rather than its proper role which is the submission of an hypothesis, and then seeking evidence to support that hypothesis, then modifying it in keeping with that “evidence”.

I think Sheldrake may also have a strong foundation for claiming the existence of Morphogenic Resonance as a possible explanation (for want of better phrases) ‘psychic’ phenomena such as

  • “knowing when you are being stared at” … OR…
  • “Knowing who is on the other end of the phone when/corner even though you haven’t seen or heard from this person for months/years” … OR …
  • how “Pets know when their owners are coming back”.


See a couple of good videos on Sheldrake here below.


Rupert Sheldrake – The Science Delusion – REDUX | London Real  Interview  (Particularly starting from @9mins)   total 70 mins

But anyway… the MAIN point of this email is to say that the following article … from a SKEPTIC’s point of view is well written and thoughtfully posited.

It is analytically rigorous without being pious, fallacious, or prone to the contradictions of militant ideology-based bull-headness.

Read it and inform yourself on this debate and on a proper view of science if you dare.


My headline above, is to emphasise that Science, and in particular the proper interpretation of “the scientific method” is not about proof. It never was. Its about setting a hypothesis




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: